Phanx's profilephanx.comBlogListsGuestbookMore ![]() | Help |
|
11/21/2008 nslookup 解析域名的一点发现 ========phanx.com=========
Author: phanx Updated: 2008-11-21 ========================= C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>nslookup bbs.scu.edu.cn
Server: 68.128.128.61.cq.cq.cta.net.cn Address: 61.128.128.68 Non-authoritative answer:
Name: bbs.scu.edu.cn.huawei.com1 Address: 219.153.42.248 C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping bbs.scu.edu.cn Pinging bbs.scu.edu.cn [125.69.85.16] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 125.69.85.16: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=54
Reply from 125.69.85.16: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=54 Reply from 125.69.85.16: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=54 Reply from 125.69.85.16: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=54 Ping statistics for 125.69.85.16:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 8ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 8ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>
用nslookup解析的时候为什么会多出一个 huawei.com1的后缀呢?
原来nslookup解析域名的时候会自动把domain附加在输入的名字后面
在nslookup中用set all检查参数
> set all
Default Server: 68.128.128.61.cq.cq.cta.net.cn Address: 61.128.128.68 Set options:
nodebug defname search recurse nod2 novc noignoretc port=53 type=A class=IN timeout=2 retry=1 root=A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. domain=huawei.com1 MSxfr IXFRversion=1 srchlist=huawei.com1 >
原来附加了一个huawei.com1 修改一下set nosearch
然后再解析就对了
> bbs.scu.edu.cn
Server: 68.128.128.61.cq.cq.cta.net.cn Address: 61.128.128.68 Non-authoritative answer:
Name: bbs.scu.edu.cn Address: 125.69.85.16 >
11/13/2008 7600 SPA-IPSEC-2G和SPA-5xGE-V2配合之小问题========phanx.com=========
Author: phanx Updated: 2008-11-13 2009-03-08
========================= 某用户需要用SPA-IPSEC-2G在7600上实现到n多节点的IPSec Site-to-Site VPN, 由于7600引擎上的以太口做子接口配合IPSEC SPA不支持CBWFQ,
故又弄了块SPA-5xGE-V2.
说起SPA-5xGE-V2这卡也怪,在6500机框上要用7600-SIP-600来装,在7600上就非得用7600-SIP-400来装. 当然SPA-IPSEC-2G只能装在7600-SSC-400 上 SPA-IPSEC-2G是采用的Vlan Connect方式,即一个在传统直连链路上将IPSEC加速模块嵌入进去.以前是用一个以太口的子接口连接对方.现在则将以太口子接口上的地址移到inside interface vlan上. 然后再用 outside vlan或者一个子接口去连接对方,最后通过connect方式将inside vlan和outside vlan/sub-interface桥接起来. 以前是 sub-interface ------> 对端 或者 interface vlan & switchport trunk -------> 对端 interface Vlan2 现在是 interface Vlan.inside ---[connect engine]--- [SPA-IPSEC-2G] --- [connect vlan.inside] -- vlan outside in switchoport trunk ------>对端 或者是 interface Vlan.inside ---[connect engine]--- [SPA-IPSEC-2G] --- [connect vlan.inside] -- sub-interface.outside ------>对端 interface Vlan102 或者 配置方式就说到这里. Guide上写的很明确,but 遇到一个Bug.. CSCsg49757 Bug Details
什么意思呢,简单说就是用子接口方式做就ping不通对端,IPSec也不行.... 解决方法是在子接口下多配一个 cdp enable.... //寒... 仿佛SPA的GE卡默认就没有开起cdp. 查了Bug Toolkit,发现还没有版本修复这个BUG的(到12.2(33)SRC1为止). 就用Workaround凑合吧. 又遇到另外一个不知道是不是Bug的问题. 由于对端节点较多,所以子接口数目较多, 别人贴配置的时候一不留神把某几个子接口的配置多贴了一次. 贴完发现crypto connect语句重复的地方有提示 xxxx already connect to vlan xxx, 然后发现重复的子接口下的OSPF neighber就起不来了.ping也能ping通对端,就是OSPF无法建立邻接关系. Debug看本端有OSPF的Hello出去,但是在对端Debug却没有收到. 无奈之下,no掉子接口下crypto connect语句重新配上,好了. 依此办法对其他贴重复的子端口重配crypto connect语句, OSPF Neighbor就全部正常了. 看来SIP/SPA的bug还真不少....!
再补充一个SPA-IPSEC-2G的BUG,在Catalyst 6500 Series Switches Release Notes for Cisco IOS Release 12.2(33)SXH and Later Releases中提到:Note 也就是说用SPA-IPSEC-2G来做Remote Access VPN的时侯没法用TACACS来做XAuth。我同事就很走运的遇到这个BUG了。
2950/2960 Port Manager Internal Software Error========phanx.com=========
Author: phanx Updated: 2008-11-13 ========================= 一台2950出现大量的Port Manager Internal Software Error. LOG如下:
CST: %PM-3-INTERNALERROR: Port Manager Internal Software Error (vlanid >=0 && vlanid
< PM_MAX_VLANS: ../switch/pm/pm_vlan.c: 564: pm_vlan_get_vlan_data) -Traceback= 5B7438 60A1E0 617A48 B36EB8 B3A5BC AE7380 AE840C BDD138 BD470C
*Mar 1 08:06:02.052 CST: %PM-3-INTERNALERROR: Port Manager Internal Software Error (vlanid >=0 && vlanid < PM_MAX_VLANS: ../switch/pm/pm_vlan.c: 609: pm_vlan_get_vlan_data) -Traceback= 5B7438 60A1E0 617A48 B36EB8 B3A5BC AE7380 AE840C BDD138 BD470C *Mar 1 08:06:04.048 CST: %PM-3-INTERNALERROR: Port Manager Internal Software Error (vlanid >=0 && vlanid < PM_MAX_VLANS: ../switch/pm/pm_vlan.c: 609: pm_vlan_get_vlan_data) -Traceback= 5B7438 60A1E0 617A48 B36EB8 B3A5BC AE7380 AE840C BDD138 BD470C *Mar 1 08:06:04.048 CST: %PM-3-INTERNALERROR: Port Manager Internal Software Error (vlanid >=0 && vlanid < PM_MAX_VLANS: ../switch/pm/pm_vlan.c: 609: pm_vlan_get_vlan_data) -Traceback= 5B7438 60A1E0 617A48 B36EB8 B3A5BC AE7380 AE840C BDD138 BD470C *Mar 1 08:06:06.053 CST: %PM-3-INTERNALERROR: Port Manager Internal Software Error (vlanid >=0 && vlanid < PM_MAX_VLANS: ../switch/pm/pm_vlan.c: 609: pm_vlan_get_vlan_data) -Traceback= 5B7438 60A1E0 617A48 B36EB8 B3A5BC AE7380 AE840C BDD138 BD470C *Mar 1 08:06:06.053 CST: %PM-3-INTERNALERROR: Port Manager Internal Software Error (vlanid >=0 && vlanid < PM_MAX_VLANS: ../switch/pm/pm_vlan.c: 609: pm_vlan_get_vlan_data) 开始以为是软件BUG,遂即升级到最新的12.1(22)EA12,故障依旧.
后来,更换成一台2960,仍然报错.
检查STP.
2960#sh spanning-tree
VLAN0001
Spanning tree enabled protocol rstp Root ID Priority 49152 Address 00b0.8e21.9400 Cost 3004 Port 49 (GigabitEthernet0/1) Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Bridge ID Priority 49153 (priority 49152 sys-id-ext 1)
Address 0021.1c7a.8380 Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Aging Time 300 UplinkFast enabled but inactive in rapid-pvst mode Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
---------------- ---- --- --------- -------- -------------------------------- Fa0/23 Desg FWD 3019 128.23 P2p Fa0/47 Desg BKN*3019 128.47 P2p *PVID_Inc Fa0/48 Desg BKN*3019 128.48 P2p *PVID_Inc Gi0/1 Root FWD 3004 128.49 P2p Peer(STP) Fa0/47和Fa0/48连接的是同一台设备2811的HWIC-4ESW模块的Fa0/0/0和Fa0/0/1端口.
我检查了2811上的配置,发现用户将vlan 99上的STP关闭了.询问原因是2811上的vlan99和其他H3C的设备连接时,运行生成树会有一些问题,所以将其关闭.
经过测试,发现打开2811上的vlan99的生成树则2950上不会出现报错,所以恢复2811上的生成树就可以解决这个问题,但是又会造成H3C设备的问题.
由于*PVID_Inc是说两边STP的Vlan数目不一致,导致端口的Vlan1被Block,
鉴于用户没有使用vlan1,所以我采用了在2950上Fa0/47和Fa0/48上将vlan1从trunk中remove后,设备不再报错.
另外说一下,发现HWIC-4ESW模块上的口子无法做Port Channel....... 囧rz
|
||||
|
|